Utilidad del cuestionario EQ-5D y CRES-4 para la valoración de la calidad de vida y grado de satisfacción tras el cambio de dicumarínicos por edoxabán: experiencia vida real de un estudio multicéntrico / Effectiveness of the EQ-5D and CRES-4 questionnaire for assessing the impact on the quality of life of patients and the level of satisfaction after exchanging dicumarinics for edoxabán: Real-life experience based on a multicentre study

Antecedentes y objetivo: La fibrilación auricular y la anticoagulación merman la calidad de vida de los pacientes. El objetivo del estudio es valorar la calidad de vida y el grado de satisfacción tras el cambio de anticoagulante de AVK a edoxabán.Material y métodosEstudio prospectivo, multicéntrico, que incluye a 105 pacientes en tratamiento con dicumarínicos que se sustituye por edoxabán. Se valoró la calidad de vida antes y después a través del cuestionario EQ-5D y el grado de satisfacción con la escala CRES-4.ResultadosEdad media 75 años, CHA2DS2VASC 3,5puntos, HASBLED 2,1puntos; eventos tromboembólicos y hemorragias clínicamente relevantes durante el seguimiento <1%. El EQ5D mostró una mejoría global significativa en los parámetros de movilidad y ansiedad (p=0,023, IC95%: 0,0175-0,23; p=0,019, IC95%: 0,028-0,31). El CRES-4 recoge una satisfacción con el terapeuta del 95%, una repercusión positiva en la vida del 73% y negativa del 3,8%. La situacional emocional atribuida al cambio de tratamiento mejoró (41% vs 69,5%, p=0,0001). Se correlacionó débilmente la puntuación final del CRES-4 con la situacional emocional del EQ-5D.ConclusionesEl cambio de anticoagulante por edoxabán mejora la calidad de vida y el grado de satisfacción del paciente, pudiendo emplearse conjuntamente los cuestionarios de calidad de vida EQ-5D y el CRES-4. (AU)

Background and objective: Atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation decrease the quality of life of patients. The aim of this study is to assess the quality of life and the degree of satisfaction after changing from VKA to edoxaban anticoagulants.Material and methodsProspective, multicentre study, including 105 patients in dicumarinic anticoagulant treatment replaced by edoxaban. Their quality of life was evaluated before and after using the EQ-5D questionnaire, and the degree of satisfaction with CRES-4 scale.ResultsAverage 75 years, CHA2DS2VASC3,5 and HASBLED2,1; thromboembolic events and clinically relevant bleeding during follow-up <1%. EQ-5D showed a significant overall improvement in the mobility and anxiety parameters (P=.023, 95%CI: .0175-.23; P=.019, 95%CI:=.028-.31). The CRES-4 questionnaire showed satisfaction with the therapist of 95%, a positive impact on life of 73% and a negative impact of 3.8%. The emotional state attributed to the change in treatment improved (41% vs 69.5%, P=.0001). The final score of the CRES-4 weakly correlated with the emotional situation of the EQ-5D questionnaire.ConclusionsThe change of anticoagulant for edoxaban improves the quality of life and the degree of patient satisfaction, and the EQ-5D and CRES-4 quality of life questionnaires can be used complementarily. (AU)

[Effectiveness of the EQ-5D and CRES-4 questionnaire for assessing the impact on the quality of life of patients and the level of satisfaction after exchanging dicumarinics for edoxabán: Real-life experience based on a multicentre study]. / Utilidad del cuestionario EQ-5D y CRES-4 para la valoración de la calidad de vida y grado de satisfacción tras el cambio de dicumarínicos por edoxabán: experiencia vida real de un estudio multicéntrico.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation decrease the quality of life of patients. The aim of this study is to assess the quality of life and the degree of satisfaction after changing from VKA to edoxaban anticoagulants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, multicentre study, including 105 patients in dicumarinic anticoagulant treatment replaced by edoxaban. Their quality of life was evaluated before and after using the EQ-5D questionnaire, and the degree of satisfaction with CRES-4 scale. RESULTS: Average 75 years, CHA2DS2VASC3,5 and HASBLED2,1; thromboembolic events and clinically relevant bleeding during follow-up <1%. EQ-5D showed a significant overall improvement in the mobility and anxiety parameters (P=.023, 95%CI: .0175-.23; P=.019, 95%CI:=.028-.31). The CRES-4 questionnaire showed satisfaction with the therapist of 95%, a positive impact on life of 73% and a negative impact of 3.8%. The emotional state attributed to the change in treatment improved (41% vs 69.5%, P=.0001). The final score of the CRES-4 weakly correlated with the emotional situation of the EQ-5D questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The change of anticoagulant for edoxaban improves the quality of life and the degree of patient satisfaction, and the EQ-5D and CRES-4 quality of life questionnaires can be used complementarily.

[Blood cultures in the emergency department]. / Hemocultivos en el servicio de urgencias.

INTRODUCTION: Culture of emergency room blood samples is common practice, but open to controversy. As compared to other emergency tests, blood collection requires twice as much time and needs a refined technique to avoid contamination, and the study has no immediate diagnostic utility. METHODS: This prospective study includes consecutive adult patients with positive emergency room blood cultures. We analyzed the diagnostic sensitivity and contamination rate of the cultures and the etiology, clinical features and prognosis of the bacteremias encountered. RESULTS: During the study period, 5.2 blood cultures were indicated per 1000 patients attended in the emergency room. The diagnostic yield (positive blood cultures/total cultures) was 20% and the contamination rate (contaminated blood cultures/total cultures) was 1%. The incidence of bacteriemia was 0.99 episodes per 1000 patients attended in the emergency room and 10.3 episode per 1000 hospitalized patients. Gram-negative bacteria predominated (57%). Sepsis was the most frequent clinical manifestation (50%), followed by severe sepsis (40%) and septic shock (10%). Mortality was 22%. Diabetes mellitus and severe sepsis/septic shock were independent factors associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic performance and quality of emergency room blood cultures was high. The predominant etiology was gram-negative bacteria. Patients had a severe clinical presentation. Diabetes mellitus and severe sepsis and/or septic shock were independent prognostic factors of mortality.

Hemocultivos en el servicio de urgencias / Blood cultures in the emergency department

INTRODUCCIÓN. La realización de hemocultivos en el servicio de urgencias es una práctica común pero discutida porque, comparada con otros análisis de urgencias, requieren el doble de tiempo para la extracción y una técnica depurada para evitar contaminaciones, y carecen de utilidad diagnóstica inmediata. MÉTODOS. Estudio prospectivo de todos los pacientes adultos con hemocultivos positivos realizados en el servicio de urgencias y análisis de la rentabilidad, la calidad, la incidencia, la etiología, la clínica y el pronóstico de estas bacteriemias. RESULTADOS. Durante el período de estudio se indicaron 5,2 hemocultivos por cada 1.000 pacientes atendidos en urgencias. La rentabilidad diagnóstica (n.º de bacteriemias/n.º de hemocultivos realizados) fue del 20% y la tasa de contaminación (n.º de contaminantes/n.º de hemocultivos realizados) fue del 1%. La incidencia de bacteriemia fue de 0,99 episodios por cada 1.000 pacientes atendidos en el servicio de urgencias y de 10,3 episodios por cada 1.000 ingresos. La etiología predominante fueron las bacterias gramnegativas (57%). La sepsis fue la manifestación clínica más frecuente (50%), seguida de la sepsis grave (40%) y del shock séptico (10%).La mortalidad fue del 22%. La diabetes mellitus y la sepsis grave/shock séptico fueron los factores independientes asociados con la mortalidad. CONCLUSIONES. La rentabilidad y la calidad de los hemocultivos en el servicio de urgencias es elevada. Las bacterias gramnegativas son la etiología predominante. La presentación clínica de los pacientes con bacteriemia es grave y los factores independientes de mal pronóstico son la diabetes mellitus y la sepsis grave y/o el shock séptico (AU)

INTRODUCTION. Culture of emergency room blood samples is common practice, but open to controversy. As compared to other emergency tests, blood collection requires twice as much time and needs a refined technique to avoid contamination, and the study has no immediate diagnostic utility. METHODS. This prospective study includes consecutive adult patients with positive emergency room blood cultures. We analyzed the diagnostic sensitivity and contamination rate of the cultures and the etiology, clinical features and prognosis of the bacteremias encountered. RESULTS. During the study period, 5.2 blood cultures were indicated per 1000 patients attended in the emergency room. The diagnostic yield (positive blood cultures/total cultures) was 20% and the contamination rate(contaminated blood cultures/total cultures) was 1%.The incidence of bacteriemia was 0.99 episodes per 1000 patients attended in the emergency room and 10.3 episode per 1000 hospitalized patients. Gram-negative bacteria predominated (57%). Sepsis was the most frequent clinical manifestation (50%), followed by severe sepsis (40%) and septic shock (10%). Mortality was 22%. Diabetes mellitus and severe sepsis/septic shockwere independent factors associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS. Diagnostic performance and quality of emergency room blood cultures was high. The predominant etiology was gram-negative bacteria. Patients had a severe clinical presentation. Diabetes mellitus and severe sepsis and/or septic shock were independent prognostic factors of mortality (AU)